Weedkiller scientist was paid $120,000 by cancer lawyers The Times (UK)Â By Ben Webster (Oct 18, 2017)
A scientist who advised a United Nations agency [IARC] to classify the world's most widely used weedkiller as carcinogenic received $160,000 ($121,500) from law firms bringing claims by cancer victims against the manufacturer.Link (subscription-based, free limited access available) _______Brazil court overturns ban on weed-killer glyphosate - Reuters (Sept 3, 2018)
"...said in the decision "nothing justifies the suspension and abrupt removal of registrations of products containing glyphosate..." - Link Farmers consider a world without glyphosate--- and it's less than ideal - Genetic Literacy Project - By Marc Brazeau (Aug 21, 2018) "...something that anti-agriculture activists seem to be oddly unaware of "there are lots of other herbicides besides glyphosate and other weed control strategies besides herbicides. Nearly all of them come with greater environmental impacts than glyphosate, especially in crops where it is a linchpin of no-till agriculture." -Link Is glyphosate (Roundup) dangerous? - Genetic Literacy Project, GMO FAQ "Glyphosate is one of the world's most studied chemicals...There have been numerous reviews and hundreds of studies of the herbicide since its introduction that conclude it is safe when used as intended." - Link Bayer addressing Monsanto integration, glyphosate litigations - Southeast Farm Press - By Brad Robb (Aug 24, 2018) "More than 800 scientific reviews and studies conducted over decades by independent agricultural and health-based organizations have failed to establish a conclusive link to cancer from glyphosate use." - Link Farm Babe: No, there isn't glyphosate in your food - AgDaily - By Michelle Miller, Farm Babe (May 8, 2018) "Fear is the new sex when it comes to selling something." - Link Glyphosate on Trial - McGill University, Office for Science and Society - By Joe Schwarcz, PhD (Aug 16, 2018) "Even if glyphosate were an established carcinogen, which it is not, it would never be possible to conclude that it caused a specific individual's non-Hodgkins lymphoma. This particular cancer has numerous risk factors that include alcohol intake, Helicobacter pylori infection, exposure to hepatitis virus, various autoimmune diseases and contact with lubricating oils, benzidine dyes, wood dust, pesticides and herbicides. Making a decision on an individual case comes down to a matter of opinion forged by blending 'evidence' with emotion. The problem is that 'evidence' is dependent on who is presenting it and to what extent the data has been cherry-picked." - Link


